Deck teardowns

Famous startup decks, run through the same rubric

We scored well-known seed and Series-A decks against Vintane’s fundability rubric — the same five silent judgments a partner makes while skimming. Each teardown gives the deck a score and names the five fixes that would move it. Then run your own deck through the exact same rubric, free.

81
Buffer's seed deck (2011)
Buffer81/100

A rare deck that shows real revenue on the page — the gaps are ask clarity and a defended market, not the story.

Read the full teardown →
74
Intercom's first pitch deck (2011)
Intercom74/100

A sharp, opinionated vision that reads beautifully — held back by traction told, not shown, and a story slightly ahead of the metrics.

Read the full teardown →
79
Front's Series A deck (2016)
Front79/100

Crisp positioning and real Series-A traction — the gaps are a top-down market and metrics that need one consistent definition.

Read the full teardown →

Run your own deck free

Curious what your deck scores? Paste your deck and last 10 founder updates and get your fundability score on the exact rubric above — free, about 30 seconds, no signup.

Run your own deck through the same rubric — free, ~30 sec, no signup →

Free score, no payment needed · your deck stays private